Tuesday, December 15, 2015

JavaScript Debugging

Today I looked at Node Inspector - Node.js Debugger at

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AOnK3NVnxL8

I found that it was similar to Debug | Web Tools

https://developers.google.com/web/tools/chrome-devtools/debug/?hl=en

edit: a more in-depth tutorial is at: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-q1z8BPFItw

In both sources inserting debug code was mentioned.  I suppose this is a lot like what I wrote on IRC on December 24th.

" JavaScript Debug allows for logging levels (https://github.com/pimterry/loglevel). Pim Terry built a Library that allows for various logging levels (https://github.com/pimterry/loglevel). Elijah Manor wrote a review post about ways to manage console.log statements from development to production code (http://elijahmanor.com/grunt-away-those-pesky-console-log-statements/). "


Google Search for Promises in JavaScript

JavaScript Promises and Callbacks: https://blog.jcoglan.com/2013/03/30/callbacks-are-imperative-promises-are-functional-nodes-biggest-missed-opportunity/

 Monads in JavaScript: https://curiosity-driven.org/monads-in-javascript

Promise Prototype: https://curiosity-driven.org/monads-in-javascript

Making a Promise with JavaScript: https://dzone.com/articles/making-promise-javascript

AngularJS Promises: http://www.metaltoad.com/blog/angularjs-promises-from-service-to-template

... but this was not exactly what I was looking for...

Maybe it was: https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/Global_Objects/Promise/catch

http://javascriptplayground.com/blog/2015/02/promises/

Sunday, December 6, 2015

MEAN stack tutorial links from Learning Coding Tutorials

This looks to be an extension of OkCoders since it adds Angular. :)

MEAN Stack RESTful API Tutorial (1/5) - Using MongoDB, Express, Angular JS, and Node JS Together

 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kHV7gOHvNdk

(2/5)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7F1nLajs4Eo

(3/5)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oVIeMfvgTz8

(4/5)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iFsYJG3fGro

 (5/5)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=06_SIzYXgqQ

Tuesday, November 10, 2015

The Simple Example with the ldnode.

I spent some time in the past two months looking at https://github.com/linkeddata/ldnode . To get it working, I needed to fix a contextify issue https://github.com/linkeddata/ldnode/issues/139 which required downgrading node to version 0.12.7. When I moved to the simple example at https://github.com/linkeddata/ldnode/blob/master/README.md I needed to set up PEM files http://how2ssl.com/articles/working_with_pem_files/ 
titled sslKey.pem and sslCert.pem. I did this by creating a self-signed key described in OpenSSL commands and tips http://how2ssl.com/articles/openssl_commands_and_tips/ .

I needed to set the paths to my PEM files as well as the ldnode module. It was done wit h the following code (simple.js):

var ldnode = require('../../../usr/local/lib/node_modules/ldnode')
var ldp = ldnode.createServer({
key: './sslKey.pem',
cert: './sslCert.pem',
webid: true
})
ldp.listen(3000, function() {
// Started Linked Data Platform
})

When this was running from the bash CLI in Ubuntu 15.04 with node simple.js at the prompt I got a blinking cursor. I am assuming that the code did what it supposed to since it generated no errors. Of course, I had no way to peer inside as it spit nothing to the screen or a browser. http://localhost:3000 was inacessible. I will have to review node behaviour, such as through Ryan Dahl's tutorial, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eqlZD21DME0 , and through OK Coders JavaScript and Express App demo https://github.com/okcoders/ok-coders-summer-2014 as well as OK Coders YouTube videos https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCR_oQSBmHvtq8KGOWtJWygA.
 .





Friday, September 11, 2015

Notes about the Detector and the Emitter for the Photogate

Detector (photo diode--clear package)
Standard T-1 3/4 package

Emitter (tinted package)
Standard T-1 3/4 package

Potentiometer Setup - Photogate

A potentiometer setup that I put together. This could be useful to adjust the amount of voltage going through the IR LED in the photogate.

Wednesday, May 27, 2015

Potato Gun

This adventure started out with a potato gun very much like this:


The difference  was the chamber (the grey part) was 32 inches long instead of 21.
The predicted velocity for this gun is 411.6 mph. The actual velocity was not measured, but it could have been a lot lower. At the end of the gun was this end cap:

This is the barbeque ignitor and cap that screws into the end of the chamber that contains the fuel / air mixture. The epoxied ignitor wires are attached to a spark gap that maintains a spark when the red button is pushed.

First feed the red wire through a hole drilled in the end cap.
Then feed the black wire.
Cut the end of the tabbed end of the red wire.

Cut the other end of the black wire.
Use wire strippers shown above to strip the ends of the red and black wire that were cut.

Solder the red wire to the end of the ignitor and solder the black wire to the metal tab on the side of the 
ignitor. 
Then epoxy the wires in place so that it looks like above. Please note that this cap is different because it is a another design that cemented on a end cap to the chamber. Fuel was added through an opening where the barrel screws on instead of through the end cap.

 This is the second gun that was built, and perhaps was one of the best performers. It happily sent a potato sailing through a box...

and into many pieces along the wall...taking the paint with it. 


  
 Cans were dented substantially and became airborne.

 
 
Windshields were cracked...                                                                                                                                                    
An even larger gun was hauled by Mazda Miata...
 
Which was fired by many people, including a guy in a propeller hat. A demonstration is here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k1WxvPtQD-E .

This one did some damage...
 
A gun with four screw on barrels was also constructed...

The chamber was constructed out of 4 inch diameter pipe in a 21 inch segment. One end had a rounded end cap that is pictured below.
The other end had a 4 inch to 2 inch reducer which was attached to a a 2 inch female coupling. This female coupling could be attached to a 2 inch male coupling that either had an attached 2 inch to 3/4 inch reducer bushing or a 2 inch pipe. The 2 inch pipe could be either 4 feet or 6 feet long. The 3/4 inch reducer bushing was attached to a 3/4 inch male coupling that had an attached 3/4 inch pipe that was either 4 feet or 6 feet long. Both 4 foot and 6 foot pipes served as the potato gun barrel.


Pictured here is what the 2 inch to 3/4 inch couplings for the potato gun look like. 
 
In this picture is the 2 inch to 3/4 inch coupling and the 2 inch to 2 inch coupling, for the 3/4 inch and 2 inch barrels respectively.

Both the 3/4 inch and 2 inch barrels were sharpened at the ends using a belt sander for the outside taper, and a file for the inside taper.
This is what the chamber would look like using a piece of borrowed 4 inch diameter stock. The difference between the appearance of this and the final design is that there are no holes drilled in the side of the chamber, and the reducer is connected to a shorter piece of 2 inch stock which is connected to a female coupling.
This is a picture of the barbecue igniter coming out of the end cap. 

All pieces of PVC were glued together except for the threaded ends. First purple primer shown on the right was applied, and then PVC cement was applied on top of this. The pieces were then connected, twisted a quarter turn, and then pounded together (usually by bashing against the ground).


Once the gun was made, it was loaded with a few squirts of propellant (the degree varying for other chamber volumes) that seemed to give the highest performance.

Much smaller guns were also constructed. One had a 3 inch diameter barrel 10 inches long. This one is shown next to the much larger one shown at the beginning of this post.


On one end of the chamber a 3 inch female coupling was glued.

A barbeque ignitor with end cap.screwed into this female coupling.

On the other side of the chamber was a 3 inch to 1.5 inch reducer, which had a second 1.5 inch to 0.75 inch bushing reducer glued into the 1.5 inch end of the first reducer.
In the hole of the 0.75 inch of the second reducer a 0.75 inch male coupling could fit.
This allowed for the attachment of a 0.75 inch diameter barrel 19.75 inches long. All of the parts (except for the barbeque ignitor and end cap) are laid out in order or their attachment in the photo below.
As inspired by light gas gun design (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Light-gas_gun), a burst disk in the form of aluminum foil was wrapped around the the male coupling to increase the initial pressure put on the projectile stuffed in the barrel.
This design was inspired by an earlier failed design of fitting a foiled covered cap in the end of a reducer. As you can see, failure occurred in one place rather than over the entire area of the foil covering the opening.


















An even smaller potato gun (actually carrot or broccoli gun or likely any vegetable with more fiber than a potato) was built with a 0.75 inch chamber.

The barrel constructed out of the ink holder of a ball point pen was attached to the chamber by the cap and end of a toothpaste tube
.
The foil part of the tube was cut off. One end was epoxied to an end cap with a small hole drilled on  the 0.75 inch chamber. The screw on cap of the toothpaste tube was attached to this end, and the ball point pen barrel was fed through a hole drilled in the cap.


Building such a small gun necessitated a small delivery system. The larger hairspray canister ended up flooding the chamber, leaving too much fuel and too little air. A butane lighter was used instead. 

 
To get the butane in the chamber, a tube from a ball point pen (possibly the retractable type) was fitted over the brass colored exit orifice of the butane lighter. Actual metering with a syringe was tried, but feeding the tube directly into the chamber and pressing the red trigger led to the only successful firings.
Fitting of the butane lighter with a tube on the gas valve for delivery was inspired by a website for a fuel meter for a disposable butane lighter http://www.inpharmix.com/jps/Fuel%20Meter%20From%20A%20Disposable%20Butane%20Lighter.html.

Below is a much larger gun pictured with the smaller guns. The larger gun has a 2 inch diameter by 6 foot in length barrel and a 4 inch diameter by 21 inch in length chamber. It looked liked the four barrel potato gun with the exception of the end cap on the chamber. It was a female coupling with a screw on end cap with igniter like for the 3 inch diameter chamber instead of a rounded and unremovable end cap with igniter.

Performance in terms of velocity of the potato gun was found to change as various ratios in the geometry changed. Performance was judged by the damage that the gun did to targets.The most damage was done when the chamber diameter was at least twice the barrel diameter with a ratio of length of chamber to diameter of chamber between 3 and 6. It was less apparent, due to limited experimentation, but the chamber volume was usually kept at 1.2 times the barrel volume. This was inspired by a website based on Burnt Latke's studies (http://www.inpharmix.com/jps/Optimal%20Chamber%20Volume%20for%20a%20Fixed%20Barrel%20Size.html).

The second smallest potato gun, shown in the picture above, had a chamber volume that was more than 1.2 times the barrel volume. It did not have that great of velocity, but it seemed to be increased through the use of aluminum foil between the male coupling of the barrel and the female coupling of the chamber. As a guess, if the barrel volume was increased such that the chamber did have 1.2 times its volume, then the exit velocity of the gun could be higher as compared to the velocity without the foil.

The effect of chamber diameter to barrel diameter was demonstrated on two occasions. First with a gun with the barrel held by the guy in the propeller hat, with and equal volume chamber that had a 4 inch diameter instead of a 6 inch diameter. Second with the gun shown at the beginning of the post. The first one belches any obstacles put in the barrel, and the second is not much better.



A sampling of cost calculations is shown at this Google Drive link: https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B5UjkynXMjE9UG1teFNYWHJXcHc/view?usp=sharing

In the following post will include contraptions built towards the goal of more accurately measuring gun velocity.